Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection vs Sham Injection and Tendon Dysfunction in Chronic Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy
To the Editor The authors of a recent JAMA article1 concluded that a single injection of intratendinous PRP was not superior to subcutaneous dry-needle insertion. Although this study provided valuable results, we believe some methodological concerns should be considered.
Try Adsterra Earnings, it’s 100% Authentic to make money more and more.
First, standardized ultrasound-guided injection should have been done to improve PRP efficacy. Studies have shown a higher degree of pain with intratendinous vascularity in pathologic tendons.2 Additionally, the authors should have provided the exact anatomical locations of injections, such as midportion of Achilles tendon, peritendinous tissue, or Karger fat pad, because structural damage may cause different effects on pain and local sensitization.
More Story on Source:
*here*
Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection vs Sham Injection and Tendon Dysfunction in Chronic Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy
Published By
Latest entries
allPost2024.10.26Stay Tuned NOW with Gadi Schwartz – Oct. 25 | NBC News NOW
allPost2024.10.26Good News: Historic Yankees-Dodgers World Series rivalry returns
allPost2024.10.26Former CIA director: Escalating conflict could signal waning U.S. influence in Middle East
allPost2024.10.26CDC says dozens more sickened by E. coli infections
Dillard's - The Style of Your Life.
