Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection vs Sham Injection and Tendon Dysfunction in Chronic Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy
To the Editor The authors of a recent JAMA article1 concluded that a single injection of intratendinous PRP was not superior to subcutaneous dry-needle insertion. Although this study provided valuable results, we believe some methodological concerns should be considered.
Try Adsterra Earnings, it’s 100% Authentic to make money more and more.
First, standardized ultrasound-guided injection should have been done to improve PRP efficacy. Studies have shown a higher degree of pain with intratendinous vascularity in pathologic tendons.2 Additionally, the authors should have provided the exact anatomical locations of injections, such as midportion of Achilles tendon, peritendinous tissue, or Karger fat pad, because structural damage may cause different effects on pain and local sensitization.
More Story on Source:
*here*
Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection vs Sham Injection and Tendon Dysfunction in Chronic Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy
Published By
Latest entries
allPost2025.01.30Chaotic scenes as Israeli hostage Arbel Yehoud is transferred to the Red Cross
allPost2025.01.30Pete Hegseth says helicopter pilots involved in midair collision were ‘fairly experienced’
allPost2025.01.30‘A mistake was made’: Secy. Hegseth addresses deadly D.C. plane crash
allPost2025.01.30Trump rails against DEI after deadly D.C. plane crash
Dillard's - The Style of Your Life.
